>Agent Provocatuer? Covert Police Inside London Bush Demo


It is just over one week since the Metropolitan (Met) police used batons to stop a peaceful protest against US president George W. Bush. Yet again, we head back to the The Mail on Sunday for an article by playwright Yasmin Whittaker-Khan: Was ‘friend’ who yelled abuse at police on anti-war demo a stooge or a thug, asks writer (article also on Stop The War website).

According to the article, while on the protest, Yasmin bumped into a known senior police officer, now looking somewhat like a press photographer wielding a larger and expensive piece of equipment, who shouted “Pigs out!” and enticed others to the front of the police-protestor clashes.

It would be incredibly naive to think that the police and state would not have undercover agents inside this protest, considering the president of the United States, “the leader of the free world”, or most brutal global dictator the world has ever seen – it depends on who you ask – was barely 500 metres away. But, uncover agents inciting others to join the frontlines of an already violent situation takes it one stage further to agent provocateur.

On Friday 13 June in an Evening Standard report a Met spokeswoman stated that a “large amount of covert work” would be going on around the Bush Downing Street visit.

On that afternoon, I too had an incident that made me, despite the incredibly cramped and crushing conditions, switch on the camera to grab a clear shot of the perpetrator.

The man, who forcefully barged past to get to a position right in front of me, knocking into a woman and others at the same time, wore a black shirt, black fleece and a black baseball cap. He was late 30s early 40s.

Once in position he looked nervous and completely out of place. I spotted a walkie-talkie sticking out of his right pocket. He too, like the account of Yasmin Whittaker-Khan, seemed to be carrying a large and expensive-looking camera, and at first impressions looked like a photojournalist.

After barging into me and the woman, I confronted him, asking: “What the hell do think you’re doing?”

He replied by saying something like, “don’t even think about it, pal.”

From then on, until I was distracted by batons raining down on protestors heads, I filmed him as he moved further into the protest, to stand close to Respect MP George Galloway, still looking nervous and edgy.

He did not participate in the protest, in fact he seemed visibly offended by the protestors, and at no time did he seem interested in the police clashes, which, at that time, every other journalist was pointing their cameras at, snapping vigorously. In short, he stood out like a sore thumb and did not belong there.

The Evening Standard also reported the police and security costs for that day would be somewhere in the region of £1 million ($), whereas the policing to protect the Beijing Olympic Torch back in April was £746,000.

By Monday 16 June, according to the free London newspaper The Metro – not the most newsworthy of papers, but free – the final cost to welcome George W. Bush was around £5 million ($). Scotland Yard refused to comment on the full cost at the time of that report.

But still, the question is laid down: what would the police and state gain from inciting violence or provocation during this protest?

My last article asked what the state response would be to two recent anti-war protests turning to unrest and even violence. For one thing, in the eyes of an authority with a set political agenda, these recent incidents only highlight the need for the current restrictions on protest and civil rights and the impending further laws to be brought in under the 2008 Counter Terrorism Act.

The sceptic would claim if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about. But as the last eight years has seen, even before 9/11, despite the UK government assurances this would never happen, the terrorism and other laws have been used against peaceful protestors, to curb military veterans speaking out and to curtail demonstration and the everyday public life.

The 2005 Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (SOCPA) banned unauthorised protest within a kilometre of the seat of UK democracy, the Houses of Parliament. Again, despite abject government assurances this law was solely created to protect parliament from terrorists hiding in a demonstration, “SOCPA zones” started popping up all over the UK. At military bases, nuclear installations and even animal research laboratories. And then “free speech zones” appeared – insinuating free speech was illegal outside those zones.

Now the 2008 Counter Terrorism Bill looks set to remove the need for a court order to seize any material considered “suspicious” or evidence by police in any situation. That includes legitimate working journalists, for instance, in a protest, a protest where police and protestors clash. A protest like when London welcomed George W Bush.

All stills are taken from video footage are (c) Jason N. Parkinson 2008.

Please contact the AUTHOR for access to the extensive four-year video archive.



2 responses to “>Agent Provocatuer? Covert Police Inside London Bush Demo

  1. >情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,a片,情趣用品免費A片,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛情色文學,色情A片,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,言情小說,愛情小說,AV片,A漫,AVDVD,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,成人交友,成人電影,成人貼圖,成人小說,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人遊戲,愛情公寓,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色小說,成人論壇美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,視訊,免費視訊,美女交友,成人交友,聊天室交友,微風論壇,微風成人,情色貼圖,色情,微風,聊天室尋夢園,交友,視訊交友,視訊聊天,視訊辣妹,一夜情A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,.18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人網站,成人圖片,AV女優,成人光碟,色情,色情影片,免費A片下載,SEX,AV,色情網站,本土自拍,性愛,成人影片,情色文學,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人貼圖

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s